<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/12955/the+worst+of+email+and+IM+together"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google+wave" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/wave" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google+wave" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google+wave+preview" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google+wave+invite" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/robert+scoble" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/scobleizer" /><dc:title>the worst of email and IM together</dc:title><dc:description>Like in the early days of gmail, google wave invites are being requested and offered all over the show, limiting (or saying you are limiting) the number of signups is a good strategy. So, got mine, will I use it? We'll see... Robert Scoble says:it br... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
