<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/10335/Scrap+the+licence+fee"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/bbc" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/tv" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/rant" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/itv" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/folkestone" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/hythe" /><dc:title>Scrap the licence fee</dc:title><dc:description>The BBC are a bit annoying at the moment aren't they? If they're not punking the the queen with crazy video pranks, they're ripping off the public with phoney competitions. Why not get rid of the licence fee, and replace it with a subscription for BB... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/10338/RE:+Scrap+the+licence+fee"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>RE: Scrap the licence fee</dc:title><dc:description>Tosh.So a company they use to make programs spiced up a show, it's hardly earth shattering. And so they messed up a couple of competitions - the technology for those things is quite flakey and no-one was hugely out of pocket like they were on Richard... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
