<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/10101/Glastonbury+ticket+touts+FOILED!"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>Glastonbury ticket touts FOILED!</dc:title><dc:description>So says the BBC, the new security measures and pre-registration mean no Glastonbury tickets on ebay, nor on any of the other online ticket touts.In other music news today, EMI are to remove DRM from MP3s, you know what those TLAs mean if you need to.... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/10107/RE:+Glastonbury+ticket+touts+FOILED!"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>RE: Glastonbury ticket touts FOILED!</dc:title><dc:description>Lovin the snap previews!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They are charging more for non-drm'd music - I don't know why higher bit-rate means they should be more expensive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Money grabbing gits.</dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/10111/RE:+Glastonbury+ticket+touts+FOILED!"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>RE: Glastonbury ticket touts FOILED!</dc:title><dc:description>I think their argument would be &quot;to cover the inevitable piracy&quot; but I'm with you - the less the charge for tracks the less people would bother to pirate them.  If they can get down to somewhere between 15-30p per track they'd make a mint.  Why would... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
