<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/3327/Dodgy+referers"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/perl" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/script" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/referer" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/spam" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/referer+spam" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/code" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/access+logs" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/referers" /><dc:title>Dodgy referers</dc:title><dc:description>Just written some code to plug into my refererCode scripts to stop this referer spam nonsense... it's sure to be a bit too strict at first, but what it's going to do is check each new referer I get in my logs, request that page to see if there really... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/3328/RE:+Dodgy+referers"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>RE: Dodgy referers</dc:title><dc:description>I read that as dodgy referees and my ears perked up. Now I see it's just drivel, I'm disappointed.</dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
