<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/11462/New+google+walking+directions+%28needs+some+work%29"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google+maps" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/google+map" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/map" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/maps" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/cuil" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/cuil.com" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/folkestone" /><dc:title>New google walking directions (needs some work)</dc:title><dc:description>120 miles on foot or two miles by road, hmm. I think they put these deliberate mistakes in there just to get people talking.Talking of google, cuil.com is launched, they've been spidering this site for a while, it's a new search site started by some ... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
