<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/10961/Nepotism+at+the+Guardian"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/popbitch" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/guardian" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/nepotism" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/thailand" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/india" /><dc:title>Nepotism at the Guardian</dc:title><dc:description>Expect this one to show up in Private Eye next week. The comments do seem to have been pretty brutal right from the off.It could be a spoof, but probably it's genuine and there to appeal to the child market.Via popbitch message board.... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
