<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/11401/If+my+own+pictures+are+too+dangerous+and+controversial+for+you"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/folkestone" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/triennial" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/tourism" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/pictures" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/flickr" /><dc:title>If my own pictures are too dangerous and controversial for you</dc:title><dc:description>Have a look at someone else's pictures of Folkestone. Looks to me they did all of the Triennial things that we did in just the same order, but the differences here are (I think) they visited Folkestone especially for this (so The Triennial is working... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
