<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/6813/GRATE+weak+for+ROCK!"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/popex" /><dc:title>GRATE weak for ROCK!</dc:title><dc:description>If now is supposed to be such a GRATE time for ROCK, as pronounced by all newspapers everywhere, then why are this week's pop charts going to make the smallest impact on popEx, EVER!?!?It's not unusual (thanks Tom) for 19 out of 20 of the pop charts ... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
