<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/m/4820/Ferry+godmother"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.clarkeology.com/folkestone" /><dc:title>Ferry godmother</dc:title><dc:description>This reminds me, front page of The Herald negotiations are under way for a ferry service to come back to Folkestone, this sounds like A GOOD THING to me.... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/m/6558/RE:+Ferry+godmother"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>RE: Ferry godmother</dc:title><dc:description>See also this... (assuming it's not the same article as the one you've posted). A sticking point for the ferry service would seem to be the harbour development. Roger de Haan is presenting his nice middle-class Norman Foster project in the near futur... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
