<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/4586/Didn%27t+get+an+aerial+fitted+then..."><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>Didn't get an aerial fitted then...</dc:title><dc:description>Guy came, and can't fit an aerial. He was very helpful and has had a good look round, up in the loft and everything, but he says the only place we can get access to put an aerial might not give us a better picture than we're getting now, so it's not ... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/4587/RE:+Didn%27t+get+an+aerial+fitted+then..."><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>RE: Didn't get an aerial fitted then...</dc:title><dc:description>Be careful about&quot;higher numbers&quot; for HDTV - as you need to see if the figure is for a &quot;progressive&quot; or &quot;interlaced&quot; picture.  For example, 1080i (1920x1080 interlaced) isn't as good as 1080p (1920x1080 progressive) as it takes two scans in the former... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
